In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Electronic Learning Association

Document Type : scientific-research

Author

Assistant Professor, Educational Science, Payame Noor University

Abstract

The present study aims at identifying the appropriate approach to improve the quality of e-learning in Payame Noor University. The research is applied in terms of purpose, is descriptive in terms of nature, and is a mixed method in terms of implementation applying an interview and a survey. The research population consists of all professors and students in e-learning department of Payame Noor University studying in academic year of 2016-2017. The research samples, consisting of 327 students and 291 professors, were selected through stratified random sampling. For data collection, in the first stage, after reviewing the related literature and conducting a semi-structured interview with distance education professionals and experts, the quality indexes in e-learning were identified. Then, in the second stage, two researcher-made questionnaires, based on a 5-likert scale, were prepared and after verifying the content and construct validity and calculating the reliability through Cronbach's alpha formula above 0.70, they were distributed among students and professors. The results of study suggest that if we are to take steps to improve the quality of e-learning in PNU, in addition to paying attention to maintaining the current quality and keeping its improvement through two components of strategies, policies, and general objectives and technology infrastructures, which had the greatest impact on e-learning quality, we should also take action through these factors to increase the impact of other components. Also, in order to improve the quality of e-learning in PNU, strategies such as paying attention to the quality of interaction, preventing significant changes in management decisions at the university, and paying attention to the empowerment of all human factors were suggested.

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

ارائه الگوی ارتقای کیفیت آموزش الکترونیکی در دانشگاه پیام نور

Author [Persian]

  • مرجان معصومی قرد

Abstract [Persian]

The present study aims at identifying the appropriate approach to improve the quality of e-learning in Payame Noor University. The research is applied in terms of purpose, is descriptive in terms of nature, and is a mixed method in terms of implementation applying an interview and a survey. The research population consists of all professors and students in e-learning department of Payame Noor University studying in academic year of 2016-2017. The research samples, consisting of 327 students and 291 professors, were selected through stratified random sampling. For data collection, in the first stage, after reviewing the related literature and conducting a semi-structured interview with distance education professionals and experts, the quality indexes in e-learning were identified. Then, in the second stage, two researcher-made questionnaires, based on a 5-likert scale, were prepared and after verifying the content and construct validity and calculating the reliability through Cronbach's alpha formula above 0.70, they were distributed among students and professors. The results of study suggest that if we are to take steps to improve the quality of e-learning in PNU, in addition to paying attention to maintaining the current quality and keeping its improvement through two components of strategies, policies, and general objectives and technology infrastructures, which had the greatest impact on e-learning quality, we should also take action through these factors to increase the impact of other components. Also, in order to improve the quality of e-learning in PNU, strategies such as paying attention to the quality of interaction, preventing significant changes in management decisions at the university, and paying attention to the empowerment of all human factors were suggested.

Keywords [Persian]

  • آموزش الکترونیکی
  • بهبود کیفیت
  • دانشگاه پیام نور
[1] Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. Instructional Technology, 12(1): (2015), pp 29-77
[2] Sampaio, R. Educar, ensinar e aprender a distậncia na era digital: principios bảsicos, proceedings of the X simpỏsio International de Informảtica Educativa, 03-05 October 2008. Salamanca, (2008), pp: 145-150.
[3] Bates, T. Re: Strategic thinking about e-learning. [Web log message]. (2010b). URL: http://www.tonybates.ca/2010/06/11/strategic-thinking-about-e-learning/
[4] Conole, G. Learning designs: Making practice explicit. Connect ED Conference Sydney, Australia. (2010) URI: http://www.slideshare.net/grainne/connect-ed-conole. Cited 2011/07/06.
[5] Rajasingham, L. New challenges facing universities in the internet-driven global environment. European journal of open, Distance and E-learning, (2011). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/article=430.
[6] Sun, P.CH, Tsai, R.J, Finger,C, Chen, Y.Y, & Yeh,D. What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computer & education,50,11831202, (2008).
[7] Komoski, K. 21st Century Teachers and Learners: Prosumers in a Bi-literate Knowledge-Driven World Invited Paper: For presentation, March 25, (2007). AACE-SITE 2007 Annual Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
[8] Mohanty, B. realization of a virtual university. The visibly invisible. National Seminar on “Open Access to Textual and Multimedia Content: Bridging the Digital Divide” at Jacaranda Hall, India Habitat Centre, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – university, (2009).
[9] Mariasingam, M.A & Hanna, D.E. Benchmarking quality in online degree programs. Online journal of distance learning administration. (4) 3, (2006). retrieved from: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall93/mariasingam93.htm
[10] Ehlers, U.D. & Pawlowski , J. Quality in European e-learning: An introduction. In: Ehlers UD & Pawlowski JM (eds) Handbook on quality and standardisation in elearning. Berlin, Springer: 1–13, (2006).
[11] Nath (The Swedish National Agency for Higher Education). E-learning quality: Aspects and criteria (No. 2008:11R). Solna: Högskoleverket, (2008).
[12] Casey, D.M. A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance education through technology. TechTrends: Linking research & practice to improve learning 52(2), (2008). pp 45–51.
[13] Hopbach, G. Forward In: Soinila M & Stalter M (eds) Quality assurance of e-learning. Helsinki, ENQA [The European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education], (2010).
[14] Fresen, J.W  Quality assurance in online (web-supported) learning in higher education: an exploratory study. PhD dissertation, department of curricula studies, university of Pretoria, (2005). Retrieved from: http://www.ndltd.org.
[15] Giertz, B. Anything goes? The concept of quality revisited. paper presented at The Sixth QHE Seminar, Birmingham, May 25-26, (2001).
[16] Harvey, L. & Green, D. Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 18(1): (1993). pp 9-34.
[17] Ivancevich, J.M. Human resource management. Eight editions, MC Grawhill Companies, (2001).
[18] Deming, W.E. Out of crisis, Massachusett Institute of Technology, Cambridge, M.A, (1982).
[19] Juran, J.E., Juran on planning for quality, New York: London, Free press: Collier Macmillan, (1988).
[20] Ishikawa, K. What is total quality control? The Japanese way, Prentice Hall, Englewood, (1986).
[21] Farokhnedjad, Kh., & Pirdadian, M. (2011). Quality assurance through evaluation of the quality of teaching-learning process in the academic system. The Fifth Quality Assessment Conference in the Academic System, University of Tehran, College of Engineering.
[22] Hakimzadeh, R, Afandideh, N. Qualification of E-Learning; Medical Education Courses of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 7(4), (2014), PP.275-264
[23] Oliver, R. assuring the quality of online learning Australian higher education. In M.Wallace, A. Ellise & Newton (Eds). Proceeding of moving online 11 conferences, (2001), (pp 222-231). Lismore: southern Cross University.
[24] Volery, H. Lord, D. Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 14 Iss: 5, (2000), pp.216 – 223.
[25] (CHEA) Council for Higher Education Accreditation., Accreditation and assuring quality in distance learning. CHEA Monograph Series 2002 (Vol. 1). Washington DC: Author.
[26] Selim, H. M. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models Computers and Education, Computers & Education 49, (2007), pp: 396–41. available at: http://www.qou.edu/arabic/researchProgram/eLearningResearchs/criticalSuccess.pdf
[27] American Council on Education. Guiding principles for distance learning in a learning society, (2002), from: http://www.acenet.edu/calec/dist_learning/
[28] Zhang, W and Cheng, v.L. Quality Assurance in E-Learning: PDPP Evaluation Model and its Application. The international review of research open and distance learning. Vol. 13. No. 3, (2012), pp. 66-82.
[29] Kantoglu, B. Torkul, O.  Altunisik, R. A Study on the Factors Affecting Student’s Satisfaction in E-learning: A Model Proposition. Business and Economics Research Journal, Publisher: Business and Economics Research Journal, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, (2013), Pages: 121-141.
[30] DEDIĆ, V., KULETO, V., MARKOVIĆ, S. ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING PERCEIVED QUALITY OF E-LEARNING. The Second International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2011), 29-30 September 2011, Belgrade, Serbia.PP.12-17.
[31] Jung, I. Asian Learners’ Perception of Quality in Distance Education and Gender Differences, The international review of research in open and distance learning. Vol 13, No 2, (2012). Available at: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1159/2128
[32] Dasher-Alston, R. M. & Patton, G. W. Evaluation criteria for distance learning. Planning for Higher Education, 27 (1), (1998), 11-17.