Document Type : scientific-research
Authors
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University
Abstract
The present research aims to explore phenomenologically the challenges of education in the ecosystem of electronic learning and the competencies required for effective participation in it. For this purpose, a qualitative approach was employed, utilizing phenomenological methods to identify and represent the phenomenon under investigation. Data were collected through purposeful sampling and semi-structured in-depth interviews with sixteen active teachers and principals in the new ecosystem and were analyzed based on the Colaizzi model. The tenth interview achieved theoretical saturation of the data; however, to ensure the validity of the findings, interviews continued until the sixteenth participant." The analysis of data obtained from the interviews led to identifying two categories (challenges and competencies) and ten main themes. The challenges of the new ecosystem include the lack of traditional communication, the neglect of the topic of education, the prevalence of academic dishonesty, the invasion of privacy, the lack of seriousness regarding the ecosystem, and the emergence of false confidence. The competencies required for the new ecosystem include operational, cognitive, collaborative, and self-directed competencies. In conclusion, it can be stated that education in the new ecosystem faces numerous challenges and requires a form of transformation in educational design. Therefore, improving its quality necessitates a shift in perspective from the authorities and moving away from these views that take education as temporary, part-time, or of secondary importance.
Keywords
Article Title [Persian]
پدیدارشناسی چالشهای تربیت در زیست بوم آموزش الکترونیکی و شایستگیهای موردنیاز برای حضور اثربخش در آن
Authors [Persian]
- امیر مرادی
- معصومه امیری
استادیار، گروه آموزش علومتربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان
Abstract [Persian]
هدف پژوهش حاضر، پدیدارشناسی چالشهای تربیت در زیست بوم آموزش الکترونیکی و شایستگیهای موردنیاز برای حضور اثربخش در آن است. بدین منظور با بهرهگیری از روش کیفی و با رویکرد پدیدارشناسی به شناسایی و بازنمایی پدیده مورد بررسی پرداخته شد. دادهها با استفاده از نمونهگیری هدفمند و مصاحبه عمیق نیمه ساختار یافته با شانزده نفر از معلمان و مدیران فعال در زیست بوم جدید گردآوری شده و بر اساس الگوی کلایزی تحلیل گردید. در دهمین مصاحبه، اشباع نظری دادهها حاصل شد، اما به منظور اعتباربخشی یافتهها، مصاحبه ها تا شانزدهمین نفر ادامه یافت. تحلیل دادههای حاصل از مصاحبهها، منجر به شناسایی دو مقوله (چالشها و صلاحیتها) و ده مضمون اصلی شد. چالشهای زیست بوم جدید شامل نبود ارتباط سنتی ، مغفول ماندن موضوع تربیت، رواج بی صداقتی علمی، تجاوز به حریم شخصی، جدی نگرفتن زیست بوم، بروز اعتماد به نفس کاذب است. شایستگیهای موردنیاز زیست بوم جدید شامل شایستگی عملیاتی، شناختی، همکاری و خودراهبری است. در پایان می توان چنین نتیجه گیری کرد که تربیت در زیست بوم جدید دارای چالشهای متعددی است و نیازمند نوعی تحول در طراحی تربیتی است. لذا بهبود کیفیت آن مستلزم نگاه متولیان و دوری از طرز تلقی آموزش موقت، پارهوقت و درجه دوم به این قبیل آموزشها است.
Keywords [Persian]
- پدیدارشناسی
- چالشها
- تربیت
- زیستبوم
- شایستگی
- Adibhajbagheri, M., Parvizi, S., & Solsali, Mahvash. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. Tehran: Bashari Publishing and Advertising. (in persian).
- Altbach, P. G., & De wit, H. (2020). Responding to COVID-19 with IT: A transformative moment? International Higher Education,103,3–4.
- D. (2009). web-based education, web-based instructional learning. Published in the U.S.A. by IRM Press, pp 67-69.
- Amemado, D. (2020). COVID-19: An unexpected and unusual driver of online education. International Higher Education, Special Issue No. 102, Pp: 12–14.
- Bagheri, J., & Shamshiri, B. (2014). Opportunities and Challenges of Information and Communication Technology for Religious and Ethical Education. Abstract Book of Accepted Articles at the Fifth National Conference on the Philosophy of Education in Iran, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman: 642 – 644. (in persian).
- Banisar, D. (2000). Privacy and Human Rights. An international survey of Privacy law and developments, Electronic Privacy Information Center. Washington, C. 1st ed.
- Birch, D. (2001). E-Learner Competencies. Available at: http://www.brightways.net/Articles/wp01_elc.pdf.
- Borges Sáiz, F. (2008). The Role of the online learner: onsite students becoming online learners. Available at: http://m.dugi-doc.udg.edu:8080/handle/10256/994.
- Bryson, J. R., & Andres, L. (2020). COVID-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: Curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44, Pp: 1–15.
- Center for Academic Integrity (1999). The fundamental values of academic integrity: Honesty, trust, respect, fairness, and responsibility. Durham, NC: Duke University.
- Chen, C. M., & Lee, Y. H. (2005). Personalized Learning System Using Item Response Theory. Computers & Education. Vol. 44. pp 237 – 255.
- Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle, R. S. & King, M. (1978). Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. Open University Press: New York.
- Contreras, J., & Shadi, M. (2015). Assessment in E-Learning Environment Readiness of Teaching Staff, Administrators, and Students of the Faculty of Nursing, Benghazi University. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 23(1), 53-58.
- Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. (2001). Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and ALN [Internet]. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926183
- Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada, http://www. downes. ca/files/books/Connective_Knowledge-19May2012. Pdf.
- Dreyfus, H. (2004). Highway Bridges & Feasts: Heidegger & Borg man on How to Affirm Technology. Retrieved January 2002, www.technology.ed/~Dreyfus/philosophyoftechnology/highwayBridges.html.
- Eugenia N. G. (2002). Enhancing Collaborative Learning through Online and Peer Assessment. Paper at the International Conference on Computers in Education in Auckland, New Zealand. DOI:10.1109/CIE.2002.1185920.
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, (p. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc.
- González, J. & Wagenaar, R. (Ed.) (2003). Tuning Educational Structures in Europe. Informe Final. Phase 1. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.
- Farajollahi, M., & Badiee, E. (2013). The Effects of Conventional Blended Learning and Blended Learning Approaches Based on Gardnerʹʹs Linguistic and Logical–Mathematical Intelligences on Vocational Studentʹʹs' Academic Achievements, Academic Journal of Electronic Learning (Media). 4 (4): 42-49.https://search.ricest.ac.ir/dl/search/defaultta.aspx?DTC=8&DC=728909. (in persian).
- Feenberg, A. (2002). Community technology and democratic rationalization. The information society. No 18. Pp181-192.
- Manuela Cruz-Cunha, M., Ferreira, L., & José Tavares, A. (2006). Web-based learning and Teaching-opportunities and challenges for higher education. Available at: https://B2n.ir/gx9675.
- Jia, H., Wang, M., Ran, w., Yang, j.H., Liao, j., & Chiu, D. (2011). Design of a performance-oriented workplace e-learning system using ontology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3372-3382.
- Holford, J; Jarvis, P; Milana, M; Waller, R; Webb, S (2014). “The MOOC phenomenon: toward lifelong education for all?”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33:5, 569-572, DOI: 10.1080/02601370.2014.961245.
- Islam N., Beer M., & Slack, F. (2015). Managing Online Presence in the E-Learning Environment: Technological Support for Academic Staff. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3): 91-100. Doi: 10.11114/jets. v3i3.744
- Kian, M. (2014). Challenges of Virtual Education: A Narrative of What Is Not Learned in Virtual University. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 5 (3), Pp: 11- 21. (in persian).
- Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2003). Students' difficulties in a web-based distance education course, Digital Academe. 1st Edition. Routledge.
- S., & Rosen. S. (2010). Teaching Online: A Practical Guide. Third edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 232-234
- Leask, B., & Green, W. (2020, May 2). Is the pandemic a watershed for internationalization? University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200501141641136
- Little, J. a., suckling, c., compel. l., & Mcnicol, D. (2002). The amazingly patient total: students in interactions with an online carbohydrate chemistry course. British. Journal of Educationology, 33(3), pp. 313-321.
- Montazer, G. A., & Gashool darehsibi, T. (2020). E-Learning: Technological Transformation in Education. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 12(1), 15-36. DOI: 10.22034/jstp.2020.12.1.1135. (in persian).
- Oleksiyenko, A., Blanco, G., Hayhoe, R., Jackson, L., Lee, J., Metcalfe, A., Sivasubramaniam, M., & Zha, Q. (2020). Comparative and international higher education in a new key? Thoughts on the post-pandemic prospects of scholarship. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1838121
- Peters, M. A., Wang, H., Ogunniran, M. O., Huang, Y., Green, B., Chunga, J. O., … & Hayes, S. (2020). China’s Internationalized Higher Education during COVID-19: Collective Student Autoethnography. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 968–988.
- Samson, J, & Keen. B. (2006). Internet addiction. Available at: http://www.notmykid.org/parentArticles/internet/accessed30Nov.2009/
- Schmelkin, L. P., Gilbert, K., Spencer, K. J., Pincus, H. S., & Silva, R. (2008). A Multidimensional Scaling of College Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 587-607.
- Schutz, K. R., Drake, B. M., & Lessner, J. (2013). Do community college full-time and Adjunct faculty differ in their perceptions of rigor in assigning grades?. American Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), Retrieved from http://www.amhighed.com/ajes.htm
- Shaeidi, A., & Sadeghzadh, S. H. (2012). Assessing Various Models of Design for Electronic Learning. Academic Journal of Electronic Learning (MEDIA), 3 (3), Fall: 33-38. http://mediaj.sums.ac.ir/online. (in persian).
- Shafei Sarvestani, M., Mohammadi, M., & Afshin, J., & Raeisi, L. (2019). Students’ Experiences of E-Learning Challenges: a Phenomenological Study. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 10(3). Pp: 1- 10. (in persian).
- Sharifi, M., Fathabadi, J., Shokri, O., & Pakdaman, Sh. (2019). The Experience of E-Learning in the Educational System of Iran: Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of E-Learning in Comparison to Face-to-Face Education. Quarterly Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning, 7(1), 9–24. (in persian).
- Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Stodel E.J., Thompson TL, MacDonald CJ (2006). Learners' Perspectives on What is Missing from Online Learning: Interpretations through the Community of Inquiry Framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning;7(3): pp. 1- 24.
)