Document Type : scientific-research
Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, AL Zahra University
2 Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, AL Zahra University
3 Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, AL Zahra University
Abstract
Abstract
Years after the first coinage of the term blended or hybrid learning, this mode of learning and its related courses and programs are still widely underexplored in the context of CALL teacher education. In an attempt to shed more light into this research base, the present case study focuses on the potentials of collaborative learning experiences in a blended teacher education course for developing English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ pedagogical knowledge of CALL. Five female Iranian EFL teachers participated in the study and were engaged in different types of classroom collaborative discussions and tasks. An analysis of in-class collaborative tasks revealed that collaboration in online and face-to-face learning contexts significantly contributed to the development of different aspects of teachers’ knowledge of CALL integration.
Keywords
Article Title [Persian]
تجربه توسعه حرفه ای مشارکتی در دوره آموزش معلمان CALL ترکیبی
Authors [Persian]
- فاطمه نامی 1
- سیده سوسن مارانی 2
- الهه ستوده نما 3
1 استادیار، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه الزهرا
2 دانشیار، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه الزهرا
3 استاد گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی دانشگاه الزهرا
Abstract [Persian]
سالها پس از اولین سکهگذاری اصطلاح یادگیری ترکیبی یا ترکیبی، این شیوه یادگیری و دورهها و برنامههای مرتبط با آن هنوز به طور گسترده در زمینه آموزش معلمان CALL مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته است. در تلاشی برای روشن کردن بیشتر این پایگاه پژوهشی، مطالعه موردی حاضر بر پتانسیلهای تجارب یادگیری مشارکتی در یک دوره آموزش ترکیبی معلم برای توسعه دانش آموزشی معلمان انگلیسی به عنوان یک زبان خارجی (EFL) از CALL متمرکز است. پنج معلم زن زبان انگلیسی زبان ایرانی در این مطالعه شرکت کردند و در انواع بحثها و وظایف مشترک کلاسی شرکت داشتند. تجزیه و تحلیل وظایف مشارکتی در کلاس نشان داد که همکاری در زمینه های یادگیری آنلاین و حضوری به طور قابل توجهی به توسعه جنبه های مختلف دانش معلمان از ادغام CALL کمک می کند.
Keywords [Persian]
- یادگیری تلفیقی
- آموزش معلم تماس بگیرید
- یادگیری مشارکتی
- EFL
[1] Guemide, B., Benachaiba, C. (2012). Exploiting ICT and e-learning in teacher’s
professional development in Algeria: The case of English secondary school teachers,
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 13(3), pp. 33-49.
[2] Hong, K. H. (2010). CALL teacher education as an impetus for L2 teachers in integrating
technology, ReCALL. 22(1), pp. 53-69.
[3] Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education, CALICO Journal.
25(2), pp. 175-188.
[4] Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward
technology, Computer Assisted Language Learning. 20(2), pp. 173-188.
[5] Donovan, J., Green, T., Hansen, L. E. (2011). One-to-one laptop teacher education: Does
involvement affect candidate technology skills and dispositions? Journal of Research on
Technology in Education. 44(2), pp. 121-139.
[6] LoParino, C., “How Are Teachers at a Technologically-Advanced NYC School Site
Integrate
Educational Technology into the Curriculum?” M.S. thesis, Mercy College, New York
(2006).
[7] Baran, B., Cagiltay, K. (2010). The dynamics of online communities in the activity theory
framework, Educational Technology & Society. 13(4), pp. 155-166.
[8] Willis, J. (2001). Foundational assumptions for information technology and teacher
education, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 1(3), pp. 305-320.
[9] DelliCarpini, M. (2012). Action research building computer technology skills in TESOL
teacher education, Language Learning & Technology. 16(2), pp. 14-23.
[10] Guichon, N. (2009). Training future language teachers to develop tutors’ competence
through reflective analysis, ReCALL. 21(2), pp. 166-185.
[11] Chen, Y. (2008). Factors affecting the integration of information and communications
technology in teaching English in Taiwan, Asian EFL Journal. 28(1), pp. 1-44.
[12] Pohan, C. A., Dieckmann, J. (2005). Preservice partnerships create classroom leaders onsite classes benefit schools and teachers, Learning & Leading with Technology. 33(1), pp.
2224.
[13] Peter, L., Markham, P., Frey, B. B. (2012). Preparing teachers for success with English
language learners: Challenges and opportunities for university TESOL educators, The
Teacher Educator. 47(4), pp. 302-327.
[14] Wang, Y., Chen, N., Levy, M. (2010). The design and implementation of a holistic training
model for language teacher education in a cyber face-to-face learning environment,
Computers & Education. 55(2), pp. 777-788.
[15] Vygotsky, L. S, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes,
Cambridge, MA: CUP, (1978).
[16] Moallem, M. (2001). Applying constructivist and objective learning theories in the design
of a web-based course: Implications for practice, Educational Technology & Society. 4(3),
pp. 113-125.
[17] Arnold, N., Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive
collaboration in an online environment, Language Learning & Technology. 10(1), pp. 4266.
[18] Crotty. T. (1995). Constructivist theory unites distance learning and teacher education,
DEOSNEWS. 5, pp. 1-9.
[19] Johnston, B., in: A. Burns, J. C. Richards (Eds.),. Collaborative teacher development,
Cambridge: CUP, (2009). pp. 241-49.
Fatemeh Nami, Seyedeh Susan Marandi and, Elahe Sotoudehnama : Experiencing Collaborative … 9
[20] Egbert, J., Paulus T. M., Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on
classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education,
Language Learning & Technology. 6(3), pp. 108-126.
[21] Kennedy, A. (2011). Collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) for teachers
in Scotland: aspirations, opportunities and barriers, European Journal of Teacher Education.
34(1), pp. 25-41.
[22] Hunzicker, J. (2011). Effective professional development for teachers: A checklist,
Professional Development in Education. 37(2), pp/ 177-179.
[23] Otero, V., Peressini, D., Meymaris, K. A., Ford, P., Garvin, T., Harlow, D., Reidel, M.,
Waite, B., Mears, C. (2007). Integrating technology into teacher education A critical
framework for implementing reform, Journal of Teacher Education. 56(1), 8-23.
[24] Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2007). Learning to orchestrate online instructional
conversations: A case of faculty development for foreign language educators, Computer
Assisted Language Learning. 20(1), pp.5-19.
[25] Tang, S. Y. F., Wong, A. K. Y., Cheng, M. M. H. (2012). Professional learning in initial
teacher education: Vision in the constructivist conception of teaching and learning, Journal
of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy. 38(4), pp. 435-451.
[26] Pawan, F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service
teachers, Language Learning & Technology. 7(3), pp. 119-140.
[27] Williams, J., Ritter, J. Bullock, S. M. (2012). Understanding the complexity of becoming a
teacher educator: Experience, belonging, and practice within a professional learning
community, Studying Teacher Education: A journal of self-study of teacher education
practices. 8(3), pp. 245-260.
[28] Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Creating and Sustaining
Effective Learning Communities, Bristol: University of Bristol, (2005).
[29] Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification
of competencies for online teaching success, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks.
16(1), pp. 59-77.
[30] Jonassen, D. H., Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing
constructivist learning environment, Educational Technology Research and Development.
47(1), pp. 61-79.
[31] Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for
transforming distance learning, Educational Technology & Society. 3(2), pp. 50-60.
[32] Antoniadou, V. (2011). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions in an online
transatlantic collaboration between student-teachers of English as a Foreign Language,
ReCALL. 23(3), 233-251.
[33] Cheng, M. M. H., So, W. W. M. (2012). Analyzing teacher professional development
through professional dialogue: an investigation into a university–school partnership project
on enquiry learning, Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and
pedagogy. 38(3), pp. 323-341.
[34] Loughran, J. J., Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Understanding Teaching and
Learning About Teaching, London and New York: Routledge, (2006).
[35] Day, C. (1993). Reflection: a necessary but not sufficient condition for professional
development, British Educational Research Journal. 19(1), pp. 83-93.
[36] Fuchs, C. (2006). Exploring German preservice teachers’ electronic and professional
literacy skills, ReCALL. 18(2), pp. 174-192.
[37] Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice
education: A review of the literature, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.
38(4), pp. 383-408.
[38] Polly, D. (2011). Teachers’ learning while constructing technology-based instructional
resources, British Journal of Educational Technology. 42(6), pp. 950-961.
10 Quarterly of Iranian Distance Education Journal, Vol.2, No.2, Serial Number 6, Spring 2020
[39] Ernest, P., Catasús, M. G., Hampel, R., Heiser, S., Hopkins, J., Murphy, L., Stickler, U.
(2013). Online teacher development: Collaborating in a virtual learning environment,
Computer Assisted Language Learning. 26(4), pp. 311-333.
[40] Dooly, M. (2008). Understanding the many steps for effective collaborative language
projects, Language Learning Journal. 36(1), pp. 65-79. [41] Nami, F., “Anytime Anyplace
Language Learning via Asynchronous Interactive Content:
Challenges and Implications for CALL Course Design,” Proceedings CALL Your Data.
XIX International CALL Research Conference, Burges (2018).
[42] Yin, R. K., Qualitative Research from Start to Finish, New York: The Guilford Press,
(2011).
[43] Cresswell, J. W., Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative
and Qualitative Research, fourth ed., Boston: Pearson, (2007).
[44] Liamputtong, P., Ezzy, D., Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford: OUP, (2005).
[45] Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and
computer conferencing in distance education, The American Journal of Distance Education.
15(1), pp. 7-23.
[46] Doering, A., Veletsianos, G. (2008). Hybrid online education: Identifying integration
models using adventure learning, Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 41(1),
pp. 2341.
[47] Nayler, J., Bull, G. (2000). Teachers are supposed to teach not learn exploring the need to
support teachers’ professional growth, Change: Transformations in Education. 3(2), pp.
5365.
[48] Park, S. H., Ertmer, P. A. (2007). Impact of problem-based learning (PBL) on teachers’
beliefs regarding technology use, JRTE. 40(2), pp. 247-267.
[49] Bordelon, T. D., Phillips, I., Parkison, P. T., Thomas, J., Howell, C. (2012). Teacher
efficacy: How teachers rate themselves and how students rate their teachers, Action in
Teacher Education. 34(1), pp. 14-25