In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Electronic Learning Association

Document Type : scientific-research

Authors

1 Graduated from Kharazmi University in Tehran and Member of Ilam University.

2 Associate Prof, Department of Philosophy of Education Kharazmi university

3 Associate Prof, Department of Philosophy of Education shahed university

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explain the conceptual model of sexual education in virtual space based on philosophy curriculum for children. The method of this research to achieve the first goal is "content analysis" and to achieve the second goal is "deductive method of the type of practical analogy". The analytical community included all the documents, sources and databases related to the research topic, which were identified and then studied and analyzed in a targeted and deep way. The findings indicate that some of the most important factors affecting sex education in the virtual space based on philosophy for children are related to four cognitive, physical, social and emotional dimensions including: Meaning and acquisition of knowledge, reflection; practice in acquiring skills through practical training and collaborative activity, conscious behavior in the face of actions and natural changes of the body, situational awareness and commitment; use of individual and interpersonal skills in information exchange, society and democratic citizen. chastity and piety, the integrity of thoughts and actions) in the virtual space, which is a framework for the model of sex education in the virtual space based on philosophy for children, which can be achieved in the form of the goals of principles and educational methods. This model related to its final and intermediate goals is based on 5 principles: (cyber sexual intelligence, cyber sexual knowledge, understanding of technological sexual relations and sexual restraint, sexual responsibility and sexual ethics in cyberspace based on philosophy for children). The method of this model is the virtual community of inquiry.

Keywords

Article Title [Persian]

تبیین الگوی مفهومی تربیت جنسی در فضای مجازی مبتنی بر فلسفه برای کودکان

Authors [Persian]

  • زینب بیرانوند 1
  • سعید ضرغامی 2
  • یحیی قائدی 2
  • محسن فرمهینی فراهانی 3

1 دانش اموخته دکتری فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران، مدرس و عضو دانشگاه ایلام، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

Abstract [Persian]

هدف از انجام این پژوهش، تبیین الگوی مفهومی تربیت جنسی در فضای مجازی مبتنی بر برنامه درسی فلسفه برای کودکان است. روش این پژوهش برای دست‌یابی به هدف اول «تحلیل محتوا» و برای دست‌یابی به هدف دوم «روش استنتاجی از نوع قیاس عملی» است. جامعه تحلیلی شامل کلیه‌ی اسناد، منابع و پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی مرتبط با موضوع تحقیق بود که شناسایی و سپس به صورت هدفمند و عمیق مورد مطالعه و تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که برخی از مهم‌ترین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر تربیت جنسی در فضای مجازی مبتنی بر فلسفه برای کودکان، مرتبط با چهار بعد شناختی، جسمانی، اجتماعی و عاطفی شامل: (آگاهی بخشی و مفهوم یابی، جهت دادن به مسیر افکار، کشف معنا و کسب دانش، تأمل‌ورزی؛ ممارست در کسب مهارت‌ها با تمرین عملی و فعالیت مشارکتی، رفتار آگاهانه در مواجهه با کنش‌ها و تغییرات طبیعی بدن، موقعیت شناسی و تعهدمندی؛ استفاده از مهارت‌های فردی و میان فردی در تبادل اطلاعات، جامعه و شهروند دموکرات، عفت‌ورزی و تقوا پیشگی، یکپارچگی رشته افکار و اعمال) در فضای مجازی است که به عنوان چهارچوبی برای الگوی تربیت جنسی در فضای مجازی مبتنی بر فلسفه برای کودکان است که در قالب اهداف اصول و روش تربیتی قابل دست‌یابی است. این الگو مرتبط با اهداف غایی و میانی خود بر 5 اصل: (هوش جنسی سایبری، دانش جنسی سایبری، درک روابط جنسی فناورانه و خویشتن‌داری جنسی، مسئولیت جنسی و اخلاق جنسی در فضای مجازی مبتنی بر فلسفه برای کودکان) استوار است. روش این الگو نیز، اجتماع مجازی پژوهشی است.

Keywords [Persian]

  • الگوی تربیت جنسی
  • فضای مجازی
  • فلسفه برای کودکان
  • مهارت‌های جنسیتی
Bagheri, K; Sajjadieh, N & Tavasoli, T (1399). Research approaches and methods in the philosophy of education, Tehran: Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.]in Persian
Bandalizadeh, F; Qaysari E & Batani, S (1400). Explanation of virtual education in elementary school with an emphasis on philosophy and children in the era of Corona, international conference on psychology of education and lifestyle sciences, Tbilisi, Georgia.]in Persian[
Biesta, G. (2011). Philosophy, exposure, and children: How to resist the instrumentalisation of philosophy in education, Journal of philosophy of education, 45, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00792.x.
Capra, F (2003). The Hidden Connections (London, Flamingo).
Carr, N (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: Norton. Case, D. O. (2012).
Cruz, Anderson and Timothy (2013). Critical thinking, (Masoud Farhamandfar, translator). Tehran: Information Publishing.
Dewey, (1897). My educational ideas, misplaced.
Divínová, R., (2005), Cybersex, jeho přitažlivost a specifika. [online], [2016-09-21].
Eakin, P. J. (2015). Self and Self- Representation Online and Off. In Frame, No.28, pp. 11-29.
Fisher, J. D. & Fisher, W.A (1992). Changing AIDS-Risk Behavior. Psychological Bulletin 111.453-474.
Fisher, R (2000). Teaching thinking: philosophical enquiry in the classroom. New
Fisher, Robert (2008). Education and thinking, (Forugh Kianzadeh, translator). Ahvaz: Resesh Publications.
Fisher, Robert (2016). Teaching thinking to children (Masoud Safai Moghadam and Afshana Najarian, translators). Ahvaz: Resesh Publications.
France Daniel, Marie (1994). Women, Philosophical Community of Inquiry and the Liberation of Self, Thinking, The Journal of Philosophy for Children, Volume 11, Numbers.
Gálik, S (2019). ON HUMAN IDENTITY IN CYBERSPACE OF DIGITAL MEDIA, EJTS European Journal of Transformation Studies, V. 7, No. 2.
Ghaedi, Yahya (2015). Theoretical Foundations of Philosophy for Children, Tehran, Merat Publications. ]in Persian[
Gloria Dall Alba & Robyn Barnacle (2005). University of Queensland and RMIT University, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 37, No. 5.
Goldman JD. (2011). An exploration in health education of an integrated theoretical basis for sexuality education pedagogies for young people, Health Educ Res. 26(3), P.p:526-541.
Hedayati, M (2013). trust children; The basics of psychological development in the philosophy program for children, Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.]in Persian[
Hiltz, S.R & Turoff, M (1993). The network nation: human communication via computer (2nd edition), Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
Hua- Lou, Ch. Zhao, Q. & Gao, E.Sh (2006). Can the Internet Be Used Effectively to Provide Sex Education to Young People in China? Journal of Adolescent Health, 39 (5): ,720-728.
Khanipour, H; Yaghmaizadeh, H; Chizari H & Hosseini, S (1400). Sexual education programs for children and adolescents: A review of Nizamand, Tehran: Educational Research No. 42. ]in Persian[
Knaup, M (2018). Unity of Body and Soul or Mind-Brain-Being? Towards a Paradigm Shift in Modern Concepts of Personhood, A B H A N D L U N G E N Z U R P H I L O S O P H I E.
Lipman, M (1995). Moral Education higer-order Thinking and OPhilosophy for children, Early child Development and care, Vol, 107.
Lipman, Matthew (1994). Thinking in Education, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY 1994, p. 229.
Lippman, Matthew and Ann Margaret Sharp (2014). Ethical exploration - Educator's guide for Lisa's story, translated by Ruhollah Karimi, volume 2, Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Lippman, Matthew, (2018). Philosophy goes to school, (Madina Farhodizadeh and Farzaneh Shahrtash, translators). Tehran: Shahrtash Publications.
Lippman, Matthew; Sharp, Ann Margaret; Scanian, Frederik (2015a). Philosophy in the classroom, (Mohammed Zuhair Bagheri Nufparast, translator). Tehran: Institute of Human Sciences and Cultural Studies.
Lippman, Matthew; Sharp, Ann Margaret; Skanian, Frederik (2015b). Children and thinking skills, (Abdol Mahdi Marafzadeh, Seyed Mansour Marashi, and Ali Sharifi, translators). Tehran: Parsik Publishing House.
Maloney, D., Freeman, G & Robb, A (2020). A Virtual Space for All: Exploring Children’s Experience in Social Virtual Reality, Paper Session 10: Kids, Youth and Play, CHI PLAY, Virtual Event, Canada.
Maughn Rollins Gregory, Joanna Haynes and Karin Murris (2017). The Routledge International Handbook of Philosophy for Children, Taylor & Francis Group LONDON and NEWYORK.
Merleau-Ponty, M (1998/1964). The Visible and the Invisible, in: W. McNeill & K. S.Feldman (eds) Continental Philosophy: An anthology (Oxford, Blackwell Publishers), pp. 167-175.
Michaud, O (2020). What Kind of Citizen is Philosophy for Children Educating?
What Kind of Citizen Should it be Educating?, Philosophical Inquiry in Education, Volume 27, No. 1, pp. 31–45.
Pang, A. S. (2015, March/April). Hacking the great distractor: How to use your smartphone to protect your attention, rather than squander it. The Pennsylvania Gazette, 14–15
Porter J. III, Boyer, M and Robb, A (2018). Guidelines on success- fully porting non-immersive games to virtual reality: A case study in minecraft. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play 405–415.
D (1995). Teaching and learning online: a correspondence education for the 21st century?, British Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), PP. 205-215.
Sandbooth, Mike (2007). Media temporalities of the Internet, philosophy of time and media, Derrida and Rorty, translated by Mahdia Mofidi, Hekmat and Marafet information magazine, number 4.
Sharp, M (1993). The Community of inquiry: Education for Democracy, in: Lipman. M (ed).
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778.
Spitzer, M., (2014), Digitální demence. Jak pŕipravujeme sami sebe a naše děti o rozum. Brno: Host. 343 s. ISBN 978-80-7294-872-7.
K & Hornsby. K (2000). The Community of Inquiry: A Survey of Traditional Classroom and Webcourse Application, This article was presented as a paper at the 5th NAACI Conference, Vancouver, Canada, ANALYTIC TEACHING Vol. 21, No 2.
Trickey, S. & Topping, K.J (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education 19(3): 365–380.
Verkuyl, M., & Hughes, M. (2019). Virtual Gaming Simulation in Bridging Nursing Education: A mixed methods study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 29 (C): 9-14.
Victor C (2014). Sex Education in the 21st Century: Strasburger,MD, University of New Mexico School of Medicine.
Wadham, E., Green, C., Debattista, J., Somerset, S & Sav, A (2019). New digital media interventions for sexual health promotion among young people: a systematic review. Sexual Health, 16, 101–123 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH18127.
Ward LM, Harrison K. 2005. The impact of media use on girls’ beliefs about gender roles, their bodies, and sexual relationships: a research synthesis. In Featuring Females:
Wegner, D. M., & Ward, A. F. (2013, December). How Google is changing your brain. Scientific American, 58–61.
Wellmon, C. (2012). Why Google isn’t making us stupid… or smart. The Hedgehog Review, 2012, 66–80.
Wertheim, M. (1999). The pearly gates of cyberspace. New York, NY: Random House.
Wilber, K., (2006), Introduction to the Integral Approach. [online], [2016-09-21].
Winch, Christopher (2009). Independence, education and critical thinking, translated by Afshar Amiri, Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies.
Yari Dehnavi, M (2014). An introduction to philosophy for children, Tehran: Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. ]in Persian[
Zarghami, S (1388). The philosophy of information technology and education, Tehran: Mabnaye Kharad publications. ]in Persian[
Zarghami, S (2009). The relationship between virtual education and educational goals from the perspective of philosophy of existence, educational and psychological studies, 11(1): 39-60. ]in Persian[
Zarghami, S, Narges Sajjadieh and Yahya Qaidi (2019). A theoretical model of philosophy for children in Iran, a research report, Tehran: Educational Research and Planning Organization. Teaching philosophy to children, Tehran: Dovavin. ]in Persian[