با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن یادگیری الکترونیکی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای دانشگاه آزاد کیش

2 دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران جنوب

10.30473/idej.2024.63684.1098

چکیده

عبدالعزیز و زهمی (2020) گزارش دادند که «تصاویر، ویدیوها و ارائه‌های پاورپوینت با فعالیت‌های تمرینی تعاملی به عنوان عوامل انگیزشی و محرک در ارائه درس‌ها عمل می‌کنند» (ص 16). برای بررسی سایر پتانسیل‌های ابزارهای بصری، از GIF‌های آموزشی متحرک (فرمت تبادل گرافیکی) به عنوان مداخله آموزشی بر اساس استراتژی‌های پیشنهاد شده توسط رویکرد پویا غیرخطی به کمک رایانه (CANDA) برای آزمایش اثربخشی آنها در توسعه مهارت دستوری زبان‌آموزان استفاده کردیم. برای این منظور، پژوهش با روش‌های ترکیبی برای مثلث‌بندی همزمان رشته‌های مختلف داده‌ها در مورد تأثیر فایل‌های GIF آموزشی بر مهارت گرامری در میان شرکت‌کنندگان نوجوان و بزرگسال به‌طور تصادفی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. تفاسیر بر اساس مثلث بندی روش شناختی داده های QUAN + QUAL و اجرای ANOAV یک طرفه انجام شد. پیامدهای آموزشی این مطالعه، کارایی GIF های آموزشی متحرک را به عنوان ابزاری برای افزایش مهارت گرامری زبان آموزان در تسلط بر زمان های پیشرونده (حال، گذشته و آینده) تایید می کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

  • References

    • Abdelaziz, H. A., & Zehmi, O. A. (2020). E-cognitive scaffolding: does it have an impact on the English grammar competencies of middle school underachieving students?, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, doi:10.1080/02680513.2020.1774356
    • AbuSeileek, A. F. (2009). The effect of using an online-based course on the learning of grammar inductively and deductively. ReCALL, 21(3), 319–336. doi.org/10.1017/S095834400999005X
    • Altintas, E., Iigun, Ş., & Kucuk, S. (2017). Evaluation of use of Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) animations in mathematics education. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(23), 1112-1119. doi.org/10.5897/%20ERR2017.3369
    • Ausubel, D. (2006). The subsumption learning theory. Retrieved September 17th, 2018 from http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/subsumption-theory/.
    • Alharbi, M. A. (2020). Integration of video in teaching grammar to EFL Arab Learners. CALL-EJ, 20(1), 135–153.
    • Bahari, A. (2019). FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and nonlinear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency. Computers & Education, 130(3), 40–58. doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.009
    • Bahari, A. (2020a). CANDA: Computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–15. doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805774
    • Bahari, A. (2020b). Game-Based Collaborative Vocabulary Learning in Blended and Distance L2 Learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 1–22. doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1814229
    • Bahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021a). Establishing a nonlinear dynamic individual-centered language assessment model: A dynamic systems theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1-15. doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1950769
    • Bahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021b). Establishing a computer-assisted interactive reading model. Computers & Education, doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104261
    • Baturay, M. H., Daloglu, A., & Yildirim, S. (2010). Language practice with multimedia supported web-based grammar revision material. ReCALL, 22(3), 313–331. org/10.1017/S0958344010000182
    • Bikowski, D. (2018). Technology for Teaching Grammar. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (Eds. J.I. Liontas, T. International Association and M. DelliCarpini). doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0441
    • Bulbul, M. Ş., & Ilgun, Ş. (2015). Matematik egitiminde kullanilabilecek bazi gif animasyonlarindaki gorsel ve egitsel ozellikler. Sustainable and Accessible Sci. Educ. Magazine 1(1), 11-20.
    • Chen, J. C. C. (2020). The effects of pre-task planning on EFL learners’ oral performance in a 3D multi-user virtual environment. ReCALL, doi:10.1017/S0958344020000026
    • Chen, P. J. (2016). Learners' metalinguistic and affective performance in blogging to write, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 790-814, doi:10.1080/09588221.2015.1068813
    • Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., Xie, H., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). Effects of captions and English proficiency on learning effectiveness, motivation and attitude in augmented-reality-enhanced theme-based contextualized EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 33(12), 131. doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1704787
    • Corkill, A. J. (1992). Advance organizers: Facilitators of recall. Educational Psychology Review, 4(1), 33–68. doi:10.1007/BF01322394
    • Cornillie, F., Van Den Noortgate, W., Van den Branden, K., & Desmet, P. (2018). Examining focused L2 practice: From in vitro to in vivo. Language, Learning and Technology, 23(3), 10–26.
    • Cowan, R., Choo, J., & Lee, G. S. (2014). ICALL for improving Korean l2 writers’ ability to edit grammatical errors. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 193–207.
    • Dehghanzadeh, H., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., Talaee, E., & Noroozi, O. (2019). Using gamification to support learning English as a second language: a systematic review, Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1648298
    • Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
    • Fang, W., Yeh, H., Luo, B., & Chen, N. (2021). Effects of mobile-supported task-based language teaching on EFL students’ linguistic achievement and conversational interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 71-87. doi:10.1017/S0958344020000208
    • Gillespie, J. (2020). CALL research: Where are we now? ReCALL 32(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000051
    • Hamel, M. J. (2010). Prototype d’un dictionnaire electronique de reformulation pour apprenants avances de francais langue seconde. Cahiers de l’APLIUT XXIX, 1, 73–82.
    • Heift, T. (2010). Developing an intelligent tutor. CALICO Journal, 27(3), 443–459. doi:10.11139/cj.27.3.443-459
    • Heift, T., & Vyatkina, N. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 grammar. In Chapelle C. A., & Sauro S. (Eds.) The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 26–44). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. doi.org/10.1002/9781118914069.ch3
    • Henderson, M., Henderson, L., Grant, S., & Huang, H. (2018). Cognitive Engagement in Virtual Worlds Language Learning. In: Gregory S., Wood D. (eds.) Authentic Virtual World Education. Springer, Singapore. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6382-4_8
    • Hjetland, H. N., Brinchmann, E. I., Scherer, R., Hulme, C., Melby-Lervåg, M. (2020). Preschool pathways to reading comprehension: A systematic meta-analytic review, Educational Research Review, 30, doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100323
    • Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Tai, K. H. (2020). Effects of gamifying questions on English grammar learning mediated by epistemic curiosity and language anxiety, Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1803361
    • Jung, G. W. (2020). Engaging Mobile-Assisted Learning Activities Using Multiple Mobile Apps for Foreign Language Practice. In Kumar, P., Keppell, M. J., & Lim, C. L. (Eds.), Preparing 21st Century Teachers for Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) Pedagogies (pp. 203-220). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1435-1.ch012
    • Kayapinar, U., Erkir, S., & Kose, N. (2019). The Effect of Tablet Use on Students’ Success in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Grammar Classroom. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(5), 178–189. doi:10.5897/ERR2018.3670
    • Kennedy, C., & Miceli, T. (2010). Corpus‐Assisted Creative Writing: Introducing Intermediate Italian Learners to a Corpus as a Reference Resource. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 28–44.
    • Kılıckaya, F. (2019). Pre-service language teachers’ online written corrective feedback preferences and timing of feedback in computer-supported L2 grammar instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1668811
    • Kılıckaya, F. (2013). Computer-based grammar instruc ¸ tion in an EFL context: Improving the effectiveness of teaching adverbial clauses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 1–16. doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818563
    • Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113706
    • Li, A., Feng, H. H., & Saricaoglu, A. (2017). The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of AWE Feedback on ESL Students’ Development of Grammatical Accuracy. CALICO, 34(3), 355-377. doi.org/10.1558/cj.26382
    • Rachels, J. R., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). The effects of a mobile gamification app on elementary students’ Spanish achievement and self-efficacy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 72–89. doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1382536
    • Reppen, R. (2010). Using Corpora in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Romeo, K. (2009). A web-based listening methodology for studying relative clause acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 51–66. doi.org/10.1080/09588220701865508
    • Romer, U. (2011). Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(1), 205–225. doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000055
    • Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A Meta-Analysis, Educational Research Review, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
    • Talati, I. A., Choi, H. H., & Filice, R.W. (2020). Cinebot: Creation of Movies and Animated GIFs Directly from PACS—Efficiency in Presentation and Education. J Digit Imaging 33, 792–796. doi.org/10.1007/s10278-020-00325-1
    • Teng, F. M. (2020). Vocabulary learning through videos: captions, advance-organizer strategy, and their combination, Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1720253
    • Thompson, C. G., & von Gillern, S. (2020). Video-game based instruction for vocabulary acquisition with English language learners: A Bayesian meta-analysis, Educational Research Review, doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100332
    • Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004). Application of a CALL System in the acquisition of adverbs in English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(2), 203–235. doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000334244
    • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? Int. J. Human-Computer Stud. Special issue: Interactive Graph. Commun. 57(4), 247-262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.1017
    • Vyatkina, N. (2016a). Data-driven learning for beginners: The case of German verb-preposition collocations. ReCALL, 28(2), 207–226. doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000269
    • Vyatkina, N. (2016b). Data‐driven Learning of Collocations: Learner Performance, Proficiency, and Perceptions. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 159–179.
    • Wood, P. (2011). Computer assisted reading in German as a foreign language. Developing and testing an NLP‐based application. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 662–676. doi.org/10.1558/cj.28.3.662-676
    • Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2017). A mobile game-based English vocabulary practice system based on portfolio analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 265-277.
    • Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2020). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning, Computer Assisted Language Learning, doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666

    Zumbo, B. D., & Chan, E. K. H. (2014). Setting the stage for validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences: trends in validation practices. In: Zumbo BD, Chan EKH (Eds). Validity and validation in social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Springer; 2014; pp. 3–8.