References
[1] Paiva, V.L.M.O. (2010). O outro na aprendizagem de línguas. In: Hermont, A.B., Espírito Santo, R.S. & Cavalcante, S.M.S. (Eds.), Linguagem e cognição: diferentes perspectivas, de cada lugar um outro olhar (pp. 203-217). Belo Horizonte: Editora PUCMINAS.
[2] Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos / complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18 (2), 141-165.
[3] Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics—A sociocultural perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 717–728.
[4] Ellis, N. C. (2008). The Dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 92 (2), 232–249.
[5] Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[6] Sade, A. L. (2009). Complexity and identity reconstruction in second language acquisition. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 9 (2), 515-537.
[7] Paiva, V.L.M.O. (2011). Identity, motivation, and autonomy from the perspective of complex dynamical systems. In: Murray, G., Gao, X. & Lamb T. (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[8] Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39 (4), 427–436.
[9] Mercer, S. (2013). Towards a complexity-informed pedagogy for language learning. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 13 (2), 375-398.
[10] Larsen-Freeman, D. (2013). Transferoflearningtransformed. Language Learning, 63, Suppl. 1, p. 107–129.
[11] Borges, E. F. V. (2015). Complexity approach to language teaching and learning: Moving from theory to potential practice. In: Gitsaki, C. & Alexiou, T. (Eds.), Current Issues in Second/Foreign Language Teaching and Teacher Development. Research and Practice. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. pp. 140-163. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/16552325/Complexity_approach_to_language_teaching_and_learning_moving_from_theory_to_potential_practice
[12] Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. & Henry, A. (Eds.). (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[13] Sampson, R. J. (2016). Complexity in classroom foreign language learning motivation: A practitioner perspective from Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
[14] Larsen-Freeman, D. (1998). On the scope of second language acquisition research: ‘The learner variety’ perspective and beyond. Language Learning, 48 (4), 551−556.
[15] Kramsch, C. (2012). Why is everyone so excited about complexity theory in applied linguistics? In: Bailly, A. Boulton & D. Maciare (Eds.), Didactique de languesetcomplexité. En hommage à Richard Duda. Mélanges CRAPEL, 33, 9-25. Retrieved from http://web.atilf.fr/IMG/pdf/02.pdf
[16] The Five Graces Group (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, Suppl. 1,1-26.
[17] Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved from Elearnspace: everything elearning: http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
[18] Siemens, C. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from Elearnspace: everything elearning: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
[19] Veselá, K. (2013). Connectivism in Foreign Language Education. Education and Languages in Europe / Bildung und Sprachen in Europa, 25 (17), 320-325.
[20] Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[21] van Lier, L. (2002). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In: Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[22] Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
[23] Miller, D. & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, UK: Berg.
[24] Evans, L. (2010). Authenticity online: Using webnography to address phenomenological concerns. In Mousoutzanis, A. &Riha, D. (Eds.). New media and the politics of online communities. Oxford : Inter-Disciplinary Press. pp. 11-17. Retrieved from http://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/cyber5ever119082010.pdf
[25] Rutter, J. & Smith, G. W. H. (2005). Ethnographic presence in a nebulous setting. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Methods: Issues in social research in the Internet (pp. 81–92). Oxford, UK: Berg.
[26] Schensul, J. J. (2012). Methodology, methods, and tools in qualitative research. In S.D. Lapan, M.T., Quartaroli & Riemer, F.J. (Eds.) Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[27] Fetterman, D. M. (1998).Ethnography: Step by step. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[28] Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2015). Using netnography to explore the culture of online language teaching communities. CALICO Journal, 32 (3), 426-448.
[29] Shih, Y. C. & Yan, M. T. (2008).A Collaborative Virtual Environment for Situated Language Learning Using VEC3D.Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 56-68.
[30] Charnet, C. & Veyrier, C. A. (2008). Virtual ethnography methodology for researching networked learning. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2008/abstracts/PDFs/Charnet_32-37.pdf
[31] Bosch, T. E, (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communicatio, 35(2), 185–200.
[32] Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2–3), 87-105.
)