با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن یادگیری الکترونیکی ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی

نویسنده

کارشناسی ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور

10.30473/idej.2023.10175

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی اثربخشی آموزش ترکیبی در نظام آموزش از دور بر عملکرد تحصیلی درس هنر دانش آموزان پایه هفتم متوسطه اول شهرستان گناباد در سال تحصیلی96-95 بود. پژوهش از نوع نیمه تجربی با طرح پژوهش پیش آزمون پس آزمون با گروه آزمایش و کنترل انجام شد. جامعه پژوهشی شامل کلیه دانش آموزان دختر پایه هفتم متوسطه اول در شهرستان گناباد بود، که درسال تحصیلی 96-95 مشغول به تحصیل هستند. نمونه پژوهش که به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس انتخاب شده بود شامل 58 دانش آموز بودند که در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل تقسیم شدند که این دو گروه بر اساس پیشرفت تحصیلی همگن شده بودند. به گروه آزمایش آموزش‌ها به صورت ترکیبی داده شده و گروه کنترل به سبک و شیوه عادی و سنتی آموزش می‌دیدند پیش آزمون عملکرد تحصیلی درس هنر بر روی دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل اجرا گردید و پس از آن آموزش ترکیبی در 12 جلسه برای دانش آموزان گروه آزمایش اجرا شد و بعد از پایان دوره آموزشی مجدد از هر دو گروه پس آزمون عملکرد تحصیلی گرفته شد. نتایج این پژوهش با استفاده از تحلیل کواریانس با استفاده از نرم افزار spss مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافته های پژوهش نشان داد که عملکرد تحصیلی دانش آموزان گروه آزمایش در مباحث نقاشی ایرانی، طراحی اشیاء کاربردی بر اساس طرح میوه و طرح گل، ایده‌های جدید طراحی از اشیاء و عملکرد تحصیلی در مباحث بافت طراحی منظم افزایش یافته بود و تفاوت عملکرد تحصیلی درس هنر دانش آموزان گروه آزمایش افزایش قابل توجه معناداری را نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

  • References

    • A AbdullahZadeh, A. (2013). Compare performance blended learning with e-learning and in-person courses in mathematics between students in the first year of high school boys and girls of Ardabil city. New Educational Ideas, 9(2), 19.
    • Ajam, A. A., Zabet, H., & Nesai, M. (2023). A phenomenological study of the challenges of virtual education and evaluation in primary schools from the perspective of teachers and parents. Iranian Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 22–9.
    • Aksoy, N. (2008). Multigrade schooling in Turkey: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.05.002
    • Blum, N., & Diwan, R. (2007). Small, Multigrade Schools and Increasing Access to Primary Education in India: National Context and NGO Initiatives. CREATE Pathways to Access. Research Monograph No. 17. In Online Submission (Issue 17).
    • Burgon, H., & Williams, D. D. (2003). Case 3: Bringing off-campus students on campus: An evaluation of a blended course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 253–260.
    • Duarte, A., & Fernandes, S. (2005). Self-regulated collaborative learning in the multigrade classroom: introduction and testing of a game for developing self-regulation of approaches to learning. Lifelong E-Learning for Multigrade School Teachers, 7.
    • Engin, G. (2018). The Opinions of the Multigrade Classroom Teachers on Multigrade Class Teaching Practices (Multiple Case Analysis: Netherlands-Turkey Example). International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(1), 177–200.
    • Francis, J. (2017). The effects of technology on student motivation and engagement in classroom-based learning.
    • Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.
    • Graham, C. R. (2018). Current research in blended learning. Handbook of Distance Education, 173–188.
    • Gürel, N., Çapar, D., & Kartal, S. (2014). Teacher’s perceptions about multi-age classes applications: A qualitative research Birleştirilmiş sınıf uygulamalarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri: Nitel bir araştırma. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(1), 1056–1076.
    • Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17(3), 300.
    • Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum. International Conference on Hybrid Learning and Education, 66–78.
    • Hunkins, F. P., & Ornstein, A. C. (2016). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson Education.
    • Hyry-Beihammer, E. K., & Hascher, T. (2015). Multi-grade teaching practices in Austrian and Finnish primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 74, 104–113.
    • Ibrahim, A. Y. (2019). Effect of blended learning on students’achievement in senior secondary geography in niger state, nigeria. E-Academia Journal, 8(1).
    • Ibrahim, M. M., & Nat, M. (2019). Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2
    • İlter, İ. (2015). Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Birleştirilmiş Sınıf Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları. Ilkogretim Online, 14(4).
    • Islam, S., Baharun, H., Muali, C., Ghufron, M. I., Bali, M. el I., Wijaya, M., & Marzuki, I. (2018). To Boost Students’ Motivation and Achievement through Blended Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1), 12046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012046
    • Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.
    • Kumar, R., & Pande, N. (2017). Technology-mediated learning paradigm and the blended learning ecosystem: what works for working professionals? Procedia Computer Science, 122, 1114–1123.
    • Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184.
    • López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826.
    • Mason, D. A., & Burns, R. B. (1994). A review of the literature on combination classes. California Educational Research Cooperative, School of Education, University ….
    • Mortazavizadeh, & S. (2010). A multi grade classroom teaching guide. Abed.
    • Moslehabady, M., Albrzyan, M., PylehVardy, N., NqyZadh, A., Noori, E., & Kamari, M. (2013). The education ministry statistics. Cultural Institute borhan (School Publishing).
    • Oweis, T. I. (2018). Effects of using a blended learning method on students’ achievement and motivation to learn English in Jordan: A pilot case study. Education Research International, 2018.
    • Puspitasari, K. (2012). The effects of learning strategy intervention and study time management intervention on students’ self-regulated learning, achievement, and course completion in a distance education learning environment. The Florida State University.
    • Rafiola, R., Setyosari, P., Radjah, C., & Ramli, M. (2020). The Effect of Learning Motivation, Self-Efficacy, and Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement in The Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(8), 71–82. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217073
    • Rostaminejad, M. A., Ajam, A. A., & Zabet, H. (2019). Investigating the effect of teaching based on humorous electronic content on the motivation and math anxiety of fifth grade students. Teaching Research, 7(2), 70–8.
    • Samadian, S. (2008). Governance and taught in multigrade classroom. Deputy Education in Eastern Azerbycan.
    • Soleimani, n., Hadadian, A and shahrayi, K. (2010). Check and compare the academic achievement and social skills in elementary school students in multigrade classroom and normal. Journal of Leadership and Management., 17.
    • Sugano, S. G. C., & Mamolo, L. A. (2021). The Effects of Teaching Methodologies on Students’ Attitude and Motivation: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3).
    • Tataroğlu, B., & Erduran, A. (2010). Examining students’ attitudes and views towards usage an interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2533–2538.
    • Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online & traditional learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
    • Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820–824.
    • Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127–135.
    • Zahiri Navi, Bijan, & Rajabi, S. (2009). Study of the relationship between a group of variables by decreasing the academic motivation of Persian language students and students. Journal of Daneshvar Behavior, 36.

     

     

     

     

     COPYRIGHTS

     © 2023 by the authors. Lisensee PNU, Tehran, Iran. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY4.0) (http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)