References

• Purpura, J. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Samarxhiu, S. (2014). A case study on the role of grammar in English second language acquisition. Lingua Mobilis, 5(51), 71-78.
• Poehner, E. M. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Berlin: Springer.
• Golonka, E, M., Bowles, A, R., Frank, V, M., Richardson, D, L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
• Hill, J. (2018). The dynamic assessment of language learning. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(3), 330-331.
• Ghahderijani, B., Namaziandost, E., Tavakoli, M., Kumar, T., & Magizov, R. (2021). The comparative effect of group dynamic assessment (GDA) and computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA) on Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners’ speaking complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). Language Testing in Asia, 11(25), 1-20.
• Green, A. (2013). Exploring language assessment and testing. London: Routledge.
• Amirian, S., Noughabi, M., & Zareian, G. (2021). Concurrent group-dynamic assessment of intermediate EFL learners’ receptive and productive vocabulary size. Porta Linguarum, 36, 119-137.
• Lantolf, P. J., & Poehner, E. M. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265.
• Lantolf, P, J., & Poehner, E, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33.
• Rashidi, N., & Bahadori Nejad, Z. (2018). An investigation into the effect of dynamic assessment on the EFL learners’ process writing development. SAGE Open, 8(2), 1-14.
• Bakhoda, I., & Shabani, K. (2018). Bringing L2 learners’ learning preferences in the mediating process through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 210-236.
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337–357.
• Kazemi, N., & Tavassoli, K. (2020). The comparative effect of dynamic vs. diagnostic assessment on EFL learners’ speaking ability. Research in English Language Pedagogy, 8(2), 223-241.
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. (2019). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 33(5), 628-652.
• Shrestha, N, P. (2020). Dynamic assessment of students’ academic writing. Berlin: Springer.
• Otto, S. O. (2017). From past to present: A hundred years of technology for L2 learning. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 10-25). New York: Wiley Blackwell.
• Chun, D., Smith, B., & Kern, R. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 64-80.
• Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2014). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40-60.
• Yunus, M. M., Nordin, N., Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., & Salehi, Z. (2013). The use of information and communication technology (ICT) in teaching ESL writing skills. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 1-8.
• Cladis, A. E. (2020). A shifting paradigm: An evaluation of the pervasive effects of digital technologies on language expression, creativity, critical thinking, political discourse, and interactive processes of human communications. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(5), 341–364.
• White, C. J. (2017). Distance language teaching with technology. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 134-148). New York: Wiley Blackwell.
• Dong, L., Mohammed, S. J., Abdel-Al Ibrahim, K. A., & Rezai, A. (2022). Fostering EFL learners’ motivation, anxiety, and self-efficacy through computer-assisted language learning- and mobile-assisted language learning-based instructions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1-15.
• Hellmich, E. A. (2019) CALL beliefs in context: A study of US high school foreign language learners. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 845-867.
• Bozdogan, D. (2015). MALL revisited: Current trends and pedagogical implications. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 932-939.
• Kheryadi, K. (2018). The implementation of WhatsApp as a media of English language teaching. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 10(2), 1-14.
• Tragant, E., Pinyana, A., Mackay, J., & Andria. M. (2021). Extending language learning beyond the EFL classroom through WhatsApp. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-30.
• Khan, R. M., & Kumar, T. (2022). Interaction analysis of WhatsApp application integration in M-learning. Webology, 19(1), 795-806.
• García-Gómez, A. (2020). Learning through WhatsApp: Students’ beliefs, L2 pragmatic development and interpersonal relationships. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5-6), 1310-1328.
• Alhashimi, Z. (2020). Bigbluebutton for e-learning: The effect of privacy and support quality. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 5(3), 59-65.
• Kiss, G. (2012). Comparison of traditional and web-based education-case study Bigbluebutton. International Symposium on Information Technologies in Medicine and Education (IEEE), 224-227.
• Ukoha, C. (2022). As simple as pressing a button? A review of the literature on Bigbluebutton. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 503-511.
• Hidri, S. (2014). Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context. Language Testing in Asia, 4(4), 1-19.
• Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2015). Top notch 1A (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson.
• Oxford University Press and University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (2001). The Quick Oxford Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Aronson, T. (1984). Grammar digest. Eaglewood Cliffs: Eagelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Birjandi, P., Estaji, M., & Deyhim, T. (2013). The impact of dynamic assessment on reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Iranian high school learners. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 3(2), 60-77.
• Ahmadi Safa, M., Donyaie, S., & Malek Mohammadi, R. (2015). An investigation into the effect of interactionist versus interventionist models of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL learners’ speaking skill proficiency. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 147-166.
• Suardika, K., Alberth, Mursalim, Siam, Suhartinim, L., & Pasassung, N. (2020). Using WhatsApp for teaching a course on the education profession: Presence, community and learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 12(1), 17-32. doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.2020010102
• Guler, C. (2016). Use of WhatsApp in higher education: What’s up with assessing peers anonymously? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 272-289.

Rassaei, E. (2017). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations and L2 development: A case of Persian EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 133-148