References

• Moore MG. Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education. 1989;3(2):1-7. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
• Chaney BH. History, theory, and quality indicators of distance education: A literature review. 2006.
• Rastegarpour H, Movahedi F, Barkhordari Z. Ethical Responsibilities of Instructional Design and Technology Discipline. Human Information Interaction. 2016;2(4):52-63.
• Gordon W, Sork TJ. Ethical Issues and Codes of Ethics. The Jossey-Bass Reader on Contemporary Issues in Adult Education. 2011:87.
• Marshall S. Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education. 2014;35(2):250-62. Doi: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587919.2014.917706
• Belle Selene X. Online Teaching in the Digital Age. 2012. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452244174
• Bates T. Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning2016, (A. jadidimohammadabadi, Trans.): Open Learning and Distance Education Resources.
• Clow D, editor MOOCs and the funnel of participation. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge; 2013: ACM.
• Swenson P, Taylor NA. Online Teaching in the Digital Age. 2012 2018/09/12. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452244174
• Engle W. UBC MOOC Pilot: Design and Delivery. Vancouver BC: University of British Columbia; 2014. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0107914
• Jadidi mohammadabadi, A. Sarmadi, M. Farajollahi, M. Zare, H. (2019). Identification and Evaluation of the Features of the Epistemology of the MOOC (Open and Online). Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences. March; 10(1). doi: 10.5812/ijvlms.83757.
• Gore H. Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Impact on Academic Library Services: Exploring the Issues and Challenges. New Review of Academic Librarianship. 2014;20(1):4-28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2013.851609
• Deng R, Benckendorff P. A contemporary review of research methods adopted to understand students’ and instructors’ use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)2016. 601-7 p. doi: http://www.ijiet.org/show-90-1074-1.html
• Esposito A. Research Ethics in Emerging Forms of Online Learning: Issues Arising from a Hypothetical Study on a MOOC. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2012;10(3):315-25.
• Kolowich S. The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2013;18.
• Hashim H, Salam S, Mohamad SNM. Investigating learning styles for adaptive Massaive Open Online Cource (MOOC) learning. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.4
• Wright F, Reuters T. What do librarians need to know about MOOCs? D-Lib Magazine. 2013;19(3/4). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/march2013-wright
• Liyanagunawardena TR, Adams AA, Williams SA. MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open Distributed Learning. 2013;14(3):202-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl. v14i3.1455
• Creswell J. Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Fourth indian edition. Delhi, india: phi learning private limited;2012
• Douglass BG>, Moustakas c. Heuristic inquiry. The internal search to know. In journal of humanistic psychology 2016; 25 (3): 39–55. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022167885253004
• Hasson F, Keeney s, Mckenna. H Research guidelines for the delphi survey technique. In journal of advanced nursing 2000; 32 (4): 1008–1015. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x.
• Díaz P. Usability of hypermedia educational e-books. D-Lib magazine, 9(3). Retrieved from2003 http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march03/diaz/03diaz.htm.
• Wilson, D., Callaghan, T., Honore, S. (2000). e-Learning the future of learning. Elearnity White Paper.