نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی این موضوع بود که آیا بین انگیزه و یادگیری زبان انگلیسی از طریق شاد و واتساپ از نظر زبان آموزان دبیرستانی ایرانی همبستگی معنادار وجود دارد یا خیر. علاوه بر این، این مطالعه با هدف تعیین اینکه آیا جنسیت شرکت‌کنندگان رابطه بین انگیزه و یادگیری زبان انگلیسی از طریق شاد و واتساپ را تعدیل می‌کند یا خیر. برای تحقق این اهداف، یک مطالعه همبستگی راه‌اندازی شد و داده‌هایی از 169 یادگیرنده مرد و زن جمع‌آوری شد که برخی از آنها در معرض واتساپ قرار گرفتند و بقیه شاد را به عنوان پلتفرم کلاس زبان انگلیسی خود دریافت کردند. داده های به دست آمده از پرسشنامه انگیزش و آزمون زبان انگلیسی زبان آموزان با استفاده از آزمون کولموگروف اسمیرنوف، همبستگی پیرسون و فرمول تبدیل z فیشر مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت تا به نتایج پژوهش دست یافت. یافته ها نشان داد که بین انگیزه و یادگیری زبان انگلیسی زبان آموزان گروه واتساپ رابطه متوسط، مثبت و معنی دار آماری وجود دارد. همچنین مشخص شد که بین انگیزه و یادگیری زبان انگلیسی زبان آموزان گروه شاد رابطه ضعیف، مثبت و معنادار آماری وجود دارد و جنسیت نقش تعدیل کننده ای در رابطه بین انگیزه و درآمد زبان انگلیسی زبان آموزان ندارد. نه در واتس اپ و نه در گروه های شاد. پیامدهای مطالعه ارائه شده و مورد بحث قرار می گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Chapelle CA. The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching. 2010 43(1), 66-74.
[2] Hutchinson A, Reinking D. Teachers' perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly. 2011 46(4), 312-333.
[3] Golonka EM, Bowles AR, Frank VM, Richardson DL, Freynik S. Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2014 27(1), 70-105.
[4] Strickland B, O’Brien MG. A review of the literature on technology in second and foreign language learning. 2013 Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/yaq7dagt
[5] Dhaif HA. Can computers teach languages? English Teaching Forum. 1989 27(3), 17-19.
[6] Schofield JW. Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
[7] Muir-Herzig RG. Technology and its impact in classroom. Computers and Education. 2003 42(2), 111-131.
[8] Zou B. Teachers' support in using computers for developing students' listening and speaking skills in pre-sessional English courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2013 26(1), 83-99.
[9] Wang L Coleman JA. A survey of Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education in China. ReCALL. 2009 21(1), 113-129.
[10] Tsai SC. Integrating English for specific purposes courseware into task-based learning in a context of preparing for international trade fairs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2013 29(1), 111-127.
[11] Dörnyei Z. Teaching and researching motivation: Applied linguistics in action series.London: Longman; 2001.
[12] Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research. 2004 74(1), 59–109.
[13] Alarcon LF. The effect of technology on students' motivation in an EFL classroom in Jujuy [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universidad FASTA; 2015.
[14] Alibakhshi G, Zeinali M, Bakhtiyarvand M. On the impact of using smart boards on improving EFL learners' motivation and learning of phrasal verbs. Technology of Education Journal. 2019 13(2), 401-408.
[15] Bahari A. Mainstream theoretical trends and future directions of L2 motivation studies in classroom and CALL contexts, CALL-EJ. 2020 21(1), 1-28.
[16] Bekele TA. Motivation and satisfaction in internet-supported learning environments: A review. Educational Technology & Society. 2010 13(2), 116-127.
[17] Aljaraideh Y. The Impact of Digital Storytelling on Academic Achievement of Sixth Grade Students in English Language and Their Motivation towards it in Jordan: January Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2020 21(1):73-82 DOI:10.17718/tojde.690345
[18] Ratminingsih NM. ICT-based interactive game in TEYL: Teachers' perception, students' motivation and achievement. 2018 iJET, 13(9), 190-203.
[19] Kustini S, Herlinawati H, Indrasary Y. Students' perception toward the integration of technology to improve multiliteracies competence in EFL classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning. 2020 3(2), 144-157.
[20] Ushida E. The role of students' attitudes and motivation in second language learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal. 2005 23(1), 49-78.
[21] Gardner RC, MacIntyre PD. On the Measurement of Affective Variables in Second Language Learning. 1993 June https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb00714.
[22] Dornyei Z. Motivation and Motivating in the Foreign Language Classroom. The Modern Language Journal. 1994 78, 273-284.
[23] Campbell K, Varnhagen S. When Faculty Use Instructional Technologies: Using Clark's Delivery Model To Understand Gender Differences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2002 v32 n1 p31-56.
[24] Ono H, Zavodny M. Gender differences in information technology usage: A US-Japan comparison. Sociological Perspectives. 2005 48(1), 105-133.
[25] Ong CS, Lai JY. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2006 22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006.
[26] Yaokumah W, Totimeh F, Kumah p. Gender Differences in Preferences and Proclivities for ICT Tools and Online Services. 2018 October DOI:10.4018/978-1-5225-7068-4.ch005 In book: Gender Gaps and the Social Inclusion Movement in ICTChapter: 5.
[27] Guilloteaux MJ, Dörnyei Z. Motivating language learners: A classroom oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly. 2008 42(1). 55–77.
[28] Papi M, Abdollahzadeh E. Teacher motivational practice, student motivation, and possible L2 selves: An examination in the Iranian EFL context. Language Learning. 2012 62(2), 571–594.
[29] Taguchi T, Magid M, Papi M. The L2 motivational self-system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–96). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 2009.
[30] Asgari M, Salehi H. Impact of Using Web-quests on Learning Vocabulary by Iranian Pre-university Students. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2018 6(22): 33-46.
[31] Haron H, Abdullah A, Alotaibi N. The Use of WhatsApp in Teaching and Learning English during COVID- 19: Students' Perception and Acceptance; International Journal of Innovation. 2021 April Volume 15, Issue 3.
[32] Aysy S. The Use of Technology and Its Effects on Language Learning Motivation Year. 2020, Volume 4, Issue 1, 86 – 100.
[33] Eady MJ, Lockyer L. Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. 2013 pp. 71.
[34] Tavakoli H, Lotfi AR, Biria R. Effects of CALL-mediated TBLT on motivation for L2 reading Cogent Education. 2019, VOL. 6, NO. 1
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1580916.
[35] Koohang A. Students’ Perceptions Toward the Use of the Digital Library. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2004 617-626.
)