نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار، گروه TEFL و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور
2 دانشجوی دکترا، مدرس، دانشگاه پیام نور
چکیده
موفقیت برنامه های آموزشی از راه دور نیازمند مدرسانی است که دارای سطوح مختلفی از سواد رایانه، اطلاعات، و چند رسانه ای هستند. به دلیل فرصت های مهمی که تکنولوژی پیشرفته برای بهبود آموزش زبان فراهم کرده استٍ، سواد رایانه معلمان به طور قابل ملاحظه ای مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. مطالعه حاضر سواد رایانه، اطلاعات، و چند رسانه ای 255 مدرس زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی را مورد بررسی قرار داده است. به منظور جمع آوری اطلاعات، پرسشنامه سواد کامپیوتر، اطلاعات، و مولتی مدیا برای مدرسان زبان انگلیسی طراحی و معتبر سازی شد. این پرسشنامه شامل سه بخش برای بررسی پاسخ های شرکت کنندگان میباشد. اطلاعات جمع آوری شده با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS20 مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که سواد چند رسانه ای و اطلاعات معلمان بین ضعیف تا متوسط متغیر است که مستلزم بهبود دوره های آموزشی معلمان و آماده کردن آنها برای به کارگیری تکنولوژی در محیط های تدریس زبان است. یافته های این تحقیق کاربردهایی برای برنامه های آموزشی معلمان قبل از خدمت و مشغول به خدمت، شامل دوره های آموزشی و عملی معلمان زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی، در بر دارد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
[1] C. Chapelle. Computer applications in second language acquisition, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press(2001).
[2] H.J. Shin, J.B. Son, EFL teachers’ perceptions and perspectives on Internet-assisted language teaching. CALL-EJ Online8. Retrieved July 17, 2010 from http://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/callejonline/journal/8-2/h-js_j-bs.html(2007)
[3] T. Erben,R.Ban, &M.Castaneda,Teaching English language learners through technology. NY: Routledge(2009).
[4] H. Shetzer,M. Warschauer, An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M.Warschauer and R.Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 171–185). New York: Cambridge University Press(2000).
[5] G. G. Bitter,S. J. Davis, Measuring the development of computer literacy among teachers. AEDS Journal, 18 (4),(1985)243-253.
[6] R. C. Overbaugh. Critical elements of computer literacy for teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Society of Educators and Scholars, (1993).
[7] T. Ozsevgec,. Computer literacy of Turkish preservice teachers in different teacher training programs.Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(1), (2011)13-21.
[8] F. Zhang, B. Barber. Computer-enhanced language acquisition and learning. New York: Information Science Reference (2008).
[9] F. Kılıçkaya,G. Seferoğlu, ‘The impact of CALL instruction on English language teachers’ use of technology in language teaching’, Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition-JSMULA, Vol.1, No. 1,(2013) 20-38.
[10] N. Milman,K. Kortecamp. Assessing pre-service teachers technology competencies: What have they learned through teacher preparation? In C. Crawford et al. (Eds), (2006). Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference,(2006)102–107
[11] C. Winnas,D.S. Brown. Some factors affecting elementary teachers' use of the computer. Computers Education, 18, (1992)301-309.
[12] G. Kessler, Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? Teacher Education in CALL, (2006)23-42.
[13] L. Compton, Preparing language teachers to teach language online: a lookat skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), (2009)73-99.
[14] T.S. Hasselbring. Improving education through technology. Preventing School Failure, 35 (3), (1991)33-37.
[15] Z. Pilus. Teachers' interest in CALL and their level of computer literacy: Some implications. On-CALL, 9 (3). Retrieved from http://www.cltr.uq.edu.au/oncall/pilus93.html (1995).
[16] D. A. Norman,Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co (1993).
[17] J. S. Daniel,Mega-Schools, technology and teachers: Achieving education for all. New York, Routledge (2010).
[18] Ch. Luke,J. Britten, The expanding role of technology in foreign language teacher education programs. CALICO Journal, 24(2), (2007) 253-267.
[19] R. Kern, Technology and language learning. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics, (pp. 200-214). New York: Routledge (2011).
[20] S. Jahromi,F. Salimi, Exploring the human element of computer-assisted languagelearning: An Iranian context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), (2013)158-176.
[21] L. Çelik,M. Keskin, The effects of the primary class teachers ‘information technology literacy skill level on students’ achievement: The case of afyonkarahisar.Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences,1(1), (2009)1167-1171. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.210
[22] S. Korobili, A. Malliari, E. Daniilidou , et al, A paradigm of information literacy for Greek high school teachers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 43(2),(2011)78–87.
[23] J. B. Son,T. Robb,I. Charismiadji. Computer literacy and competency: A survey of Indonesian teachers of English as a foreign language. CALL-EJ, 12(1), (2011)26–42.
[24] R. Dashtestani, Computer literacy of Iranian teachers of English as a foreign language: Challenges and obstacles. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), (2014)87-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082022
[25] G. V. Sardegna, Yu, Taiwanese elementary school teachers’ computer literacy and use: Implications for language teaching training programs. CALL-EJ, 16(1), (2015) 1-15.
[26]M. Dellicarpini,L. College, Action research, building computer technology skills in TESOL teacher education. Language Learning & Technology. 16 (2), (2012) 14-23.
[27] D. Bawden, Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation,57(2), (2001) 218–259.
[28] American Library Association. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report. (Chicago: American Library Association, 1989.) http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers-/presiden
[29] N. Aharony, J. Bronstein, Academic librarians' perceptions on information literacy: The Israeli perspective. Libraries and the Academy, 14(1), (2014)103-119.
[30] S. Kurbanoğlu, B. Akkoyunlu,A. Umay, Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), (2006)730-743.
[31] S. L. Thorne, R. Black Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27,(2008)133-160.
[32] E. Probert, Information literacy skills: Teacher understandings and practice. Computers & Education 53(1),(2009)24–33.
[33] T. Saracevic. Information literacy in the United States: Contemporary transformations and controversies. European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL). Dubrovnik, Croatia(2014).
[34] C. Bruce (). Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: A background paper. Retrieved February 20, 2007 from
[35] R. E. Mayer,Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press (2009).
[36] D. Unić,N. Mikelić Preradović,D. Boras, The importance of teachers in multimedia literacy education. In M. Margensten, K. Psarris, and D. Mandic (Eds.). Recent Advances in Information Science, Proceedings of the 4th Conference of Computer Science, (2013) pp.231-237.
[37] P. Ware, Language learners and multimedia: Literacy in and after school. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3,(2008) 37–51. doi:10.1080/15544800701771598
[38] N. Strudler,M. McKinney, W. Jones, First-year teachers' use of technology: Preparation, expectations and realities. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2), (1999)115-129.
[39] B. E. Zamani, Successful implementation factors for using computers in Iranian schools during one decade (1995–2005). Computers & Education,54(1), (2010)59–68.
[40] L. Li,Understanding language teachers' practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, (2014)105-119. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.07.016
[41] J. M. Clausen, Beginning teachers' technology use: First-year teacher development and the institutional context's affect on new teachers' instructional technology use with students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), (2007) 245-261.
[42] J. Egbert,T. Paulus,Y. Nakamichi, The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning and Technology, 6(3), (2002)108-126.
[43] N. Puakpong, A. Lian, Factors Affecting the Normalization of CALL in Chinese Senior High Schools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(3), (2015) 189-201.
[44] R. Debski Exploring the re-creation of a CALL innovation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4/5), (2000). pp. 307-332.
[45] T. Sonia Tladi, Perceived Ability and Success: Which Self-efficacy Measures Matter? A Distance Learning Perspective, Open Learning: The journal of Open Distance and E-learning, Published online July (2017). doi: 10.1080/02680513.2017.1356711
[46] M. Simson, Smaldino, Sh., M., & M. S. Zevasek, Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education, 6th ed. USA: Information Age Publishing Inc. 2015.
[47] C. Lai, M.Y. Gu, Self-regulated out-of-class language learning with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, (2011) 317–335.
[48] C. Lai, Perceiving and traversing in-class and out-of-class learning: accounts from foreign language learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning andTeaching. Advance Online Publishing. (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17501229.(2014).918982.
)