نوع مقاله : علمی-پژوهشی
نویسندگان
چکیده
طراحی آموزشی نقش کلیدی در اثربخشی دوره های آموزشی مختلف دارد و پژوهش ها نشان می دهند طراحی آموزشی به عنوان یکی از مولفه های تاثیر گذار بر کیفیت دوره های آموزش الکترونیکی نیز محسوب می شود؛ با این وجود در طراحی و اجرای دوره های آموزش الکترونیکی، طراحی آموزشی به نحو شایسته مورد توجه قرار نمی گیرد و در نتیجه شاهد دوره های آموزشی فاقد کیفیت مطلوب هستیم. از این رو هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی مولفه های اثربخش طراحی آموزشی الکترونیکی از دید پژوهش های انجام شده و ارائه چارچوب طراحی آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزش عالی می باشد. بدین منظور پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش مرور نظام مند و جستجوی کلید واژه های مرتبط طراحی آموزش الکترونیکی در پایگاه های اطلاعاتی علمی پس از بررسی مقاله های به دست آمده، در نهایت 33 مقاله و پژوهش علمی انجام شده بین سال های 2019-2015را مورد مطالعه و واکاوی قرارد داده است. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که تحلیل نیاز، تحلیل محتوا و تحلیل یادگیرنده، اصول و راهبردهای آموزش، طراحی محیط یادگری، تولید محتوای الکترونیکی، طراحی پیام، راهنمایی و پشتیبانی، سنجش و ارزشیابی محتوا و دوره از مولفه های تاثیر گذار بر اثربخشی یادگیری الکترونیکی هستد. پس از بررسی و تحلیل نتایج به دست آمده و تلفیق آن با طراحی آموزشی و در نظر گرفتن تجربه نگارندگان مقاله در زمینه طراحی آموزشی و آموزش الکترونیکی، چارچوب طراحی آموزشی الکترونیکی برای استفاده پژوهشگران و دست اندرکاران آموزش الکترونیکی ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژهها
[1]Cebeci, H. I., Yazgan, H. R., & Geyik, A. (2009). A comparative analysis of the effects of
instructional design factors on student success in e-learning: multiple-regression versus neural
networks. ALT-J, 17(1), pp.21-31.
[2] McGorry, S. Y. (2003). Measuring quality in online programs. The Internet and Higher Education,
6(2), pp.159-177.
[3]Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines
for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.
[4] Kozuki, N., & Miyata, H. (2008). A Practice of Blended Type e-Learning Course for Studying
Instructional Design on Pre-service Teacher Training. In Society for Information Technology &
Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3811-3813). Association for the Advancement
of Computing in Education (AACE).
[5] Debattista, M. (2018). A comprehensive rubric for instructional design in e-learning. International
Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(2),pp.93–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-
09-2017-0092.
[6] Pribadi, B. A. (2016). Practices in Instructional System Design for Effective Open and Distance
Learning Materials. 8(1),pp. 1–7.
[7] Prempeh, B. (2016). An assessment of the design of multimedia Instructions in multimedia
learning for distance learning: a case study of The Institute of Distance Learning-Kwame Nkrumah
University of Science and Technology (Doctoral dissertation).
[8] Xu, J., & Rees, T. (2016). Distance Learning Course Design Expectations in China and the United
Kingdom. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), pp.250-263.
[9] Aziz, A. A., Ibrahim, M., Jono, M. N. H. H., & Asarani, N. A. M. (2014, May). Incorporating
instructional design and adult learning theory in the e-content development of an interactive
multimedia course. In 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging
Technologies ,pp. 296-301.
[10] Teräs, H., & Herrington, J. (2014). Neither the frying pan nor the fire: In search of a balanced
authentic e-learning design through an educational design research process. The international
review of research in open and distributed learning, 15( 2).
[11] Rowe, F. A., & Rafferty, J. A. (2013). Instructional design interventions for supporting selfregulated
learning: enhancing academic outcomes in postsecondary e-learning environments.
Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(4), pp.590-601.
[12] Chow, A. S. (2013). One educational technology colleague’s journey from dotcom leadership to
university e-learning systems leadership: Merging design principles, systemic change and
leadership thinking. TechTrends, 57(5),pp. 64-73.
[13] Santally, M. I., Rajabalee, Y., & Cooshna-Naik, D. (2012). Learning design implementation for
distance e-learning: blending rapid e-learning techniques with activity-based pedagogies to design
and implement a socio-constructivist environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and Elearning,
15(2).
22 Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education (IDEJ), Vol. 1, No. 4, Spring 2019
[14] Snyder, D., & Gardner, J. (2012). Implementing a world-class e-learning technology in a
graduate instructional design course. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(4), pp.389-
399.
[15] Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (2013), Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st
century learning, Routledge, London.
[16] Triyono, M. B. (2015). The Indicators of instructional design for e-learning in Indonesian
vocational high schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, pp54-61.
[17] Bashir, K., Hassan, S. S. S., Abdallah, S. S., & Nordin, M. S. (2018). Assessment of the
Psychometric Properties of E-learning Instructional Design Quality. African Journal of Education,
Science and Technology, 4(4), pp.21–37.
[18] Farid, S., Qadir, M., Uddin Ahmed, M., & Daud Khattak, M. (2018). Critical Success Factors of
E-Learning Systems: A Quality Perspective. Pakistan Journal of Distance & Online Learning, 1–
20. Retrieved from http://pjdol.aiou.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/1-critical-successfactors-1.pdf.
[19] Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (Eds.). (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and
technology. Boston, MA: Pearson.
[20] Patel, S. R., Margolies, P. J., Covell, N. H., Lipscomb, C., & Dixon, L. B. (2018). Using
Instructional Design, Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, to Develop e-Learning
Modules to Disseminate Supported Employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment
Programs in New York State. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 113.
[21] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00113.
[22] Merrill, M. D. (2012). First principles of instruction. John Wiley & Sons.
[23] Seif, A. A. (2011). Psychology of learning and teaching. Tehran: Agah Publication.
[24] Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach (Vol. 9). Oxford University
Press.
[25]AbdEl-Gawad, T. S. A.-B. (2017). Recommendations for implementing quality in classless elearning
systems. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY.
[26]Anderson, T & Elloumi, F. Theory and Practice of Online Learning, available at: http://www. cde.
athabascau. Ca; 2004.
[27]Chin, S. P. P., Tsui, E., & Lee, C. S. (2016). Enhancing learning effectiveness by adopting a
knowledge-based usability guidelines. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge
Management Systems, 46(1), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2014-0015
[28]Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from
students perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and
Smart Education.
[29]Chou, H. L., & Chen, C. H. (2016). Beyond identifying privacy issues in e-learning settings –
Implications for instructional designers. Computers and Education, 103, 124–133.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.002.
[30]de Leeuw, R., de Soet, A., van der Horst, S., Walsh, K., Westerman, M., & Scheele, F. (2019).
How We Evaluate Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Systematic Review. JMIR Medical
Education, 5(1), e13128. https://doi.org/10.2196/13128.
[31]Donnelly, R. (2016). Opportunities and challenges of interactivity in blended problem-based
learning.
[32]Fardanesh, H. (2006). Theoretical foundations of educational technology. Tehran, samt
publication.
[33]Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model
(TAM) to examine faculty use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in higher education
institutions. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 11. )۲(
[34]Ghonim, M. N. (2018). Evaluating the Experience of Developing and Using Building
Construction E-Courses in Architectural Education. Journal Architecture & Planning, 30. )۱(
Yousef Mahdavinasab et al: An Investigation of the Effective Components … 23
[35]Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. (2018). Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning
quality in developing countries university settings. International Journal of Education and
Development Using ICT, 14. )۱(
[36]Heather A. Robinson, Anneliese Sheffield, Alana S. Phillips, & Michelle Moore. (2017).
BIntroduction to Teaching Online^: Usability Evaluation of Interactivity in an Online Social
Constructivist Course. TechTrends, 61(6), 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0187-z
[37]Hew, K. F. (2014). Towards a Model of Engaging Online Students: Lessons from MOOCs and
Four Policy Documents. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(6),
pp.425–431. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2015.v5.543.
[38]Hong, J.-C., Tai, K.-H., Hwang, M.-Y., Kuo, Y.-C., & Chen, J.-S. (2017). Internet cognitive
failure relevant to users’ satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance
intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, pp.353–362.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044
[39]Koohang, A., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2016). E-Learning Courseware Usability: Building a
Theoretical Model. Journal of Computer Information Systems,56(1),pp.55–61.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2015.11645801
[40]Kuo, T. C. T., Chen, H. R., Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2015). The factors and impacts of
large-scale digital content accreditations. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), pp.29–48.
[41]Lange, C. (2018). The relationship between system-provided learner control and maintained
situational interest within e-learning courses. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 15(3),
205–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2017-0062
[42]LEE, G., KEUM, S., KIM, M., CHOI, Y., & RHA, I. (2016). A study on the development of a
MOOC design model. Educational Technology International, 17(1), pp.1–37.
[43]Lehmann, R., Lutz, T., Helling-Bakki, A., Kummer, S., Huwendiek, S., & Bosse, H. M. (2019).
Animation and interactivity facilitate acquisition of pediatric life support skills: A randomized
controlled trial using virtual patients versus video instruction. BMC Medical Education, 19(1),
p.7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1442-5
[44]Myer R.E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
[45]Orooji, F., & Taghiyareh, F. (2018). Enhancing students knowledge building through utilising
social interactions in an online learning environment. New Review of Hypermedia and
Multimedia, 24(4), 307–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2019.1568588
[46]Park, T., & Lim, C. (2018). Design principles for improving emotional affordances in an online
learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–15.
[47]Park, T., & Lim, C. (2019). Design principles for improving emotional affordances in an online
learning environment. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 53–67.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9560-7
[48]Rigas, D. & Algahtani, A. (n.d.). Multimodal e-Assessment Interfaces: An Empirical
Investigation.
[49]Sadeghi, S. H. (2017). E-Learning Instructional Design Practice in. IADIS International
Conference E-Learning 2017, pp.13–24.
[50]Said, A., & Syarif, E. (2016). The Development of Online Tutorial Program Design Using
Problem-Based Learning in Open Distance Learning System. Journal of Education and Practice,
Vol. 7, pp. 222–229.
[51]Saleem Haddad, F. (2018). Examining the effect of learning management system quality and
perceived usefulness on student’s satisfaction. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information
Technology, 96(23), 8034–8044. Retrieved from www.jatit.org
[52]Song, H. (2004). The perceptions of college students regarding the instructional quality of online
courses delivered via WebCT. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate,
24 Quarterly Journal of Iranian Distance Education (IDEJ), Vol. 1, No. 4, Spring 2019
Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2141-2146). Association for the
Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
[53]Sun, J. C. Y., & Chang, K. Y. (2016). Design and development of a location-based mobile learning
system to facilitate English learning. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(3), pp.345–
357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0392-x.
[54]Taveira-Gomes, T., Ferreira, P., Taveira-Gomes, I., Severo, M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2016). What
are we looking for in computer-based learning interventions in medical education? A systematic
review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(8),pp.1–21. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5461.
[55]Trenholm, S., Alcock, L., & Robinson, C. (2015). An investigation of assessment and feedback
practices in fully asynchronous online undergraduate mathematics courses. International Journal
of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1197–1221.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1036946.
[56]V. Nikoli´c, J. Kaljevic, S.a. Jovi´c, D. Petkovi´c, M. Milovanˇcevi´c, L. Dimitrov, P. Dachkinov,
Survey of quality models of e-learning systems, Physica A (2018),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.058.
[57]van Nuland, S. E., & Rogers, K. A. (2016). E-learning, dual-task, and cognitive load: The anatomy
of a failed experiment. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(2),pp.186–196.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1576.
[58]Zhang, W., & Duan, C. (2017). Construction and Implementation of Institutional E-learning
Development Framework in Continuing Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology
Develo.
[59] Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2017). The mediating effects of germane cognitive load on the
relationship between instructional design and students’ future behavioral intention. Electronic
Journal of E-Learning, 15(2),pp. 174–187