References

• Abdulhamidovna, [1] Maleki H. Perspective of the natural-spiritual curriculum based on the philosophy of Islamic education. National Congress of Humanities, 2006. https://www.tpbin.com/article/22745 (In Persian)
• [2] Fathi Vajargah k. Principles and Concepts of Curriculum Planning. Tehran: Entesharat-E Bal, 2009. (In Persian)
• [3] Klein M. F. The use of a research model to guide curriculum development. Theory In to Practice. 1983; 22(3): 198-202, Doi: 10.1080/00405848309543061
• [4] Akker J. V. Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.). Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
• [5] Hasani M. Guide to implementing descriptive qualitative evaluation in elementary school. Tehran: Abed, 2012. (In Persian)
• [6] Alkin M. C., Christie A. C. An Evaluation Theory Tree. In. M. C. Alkin. (Ed.). Evaluation Roots: Tracing theorists ‘Views and influences, 2012.
• [7] Maleki H. Foundations of planning in secondary education. Tehran: Samt, 2013. (In Persian)
• [8] Noori T., Nilforooshan P. University Students’ Academic Procrastination: The Role of Coping Styles with Stress and the Dual Dimensions of Perfectionism. New Educational Approaches. 2016; 11(1): 21-40, doi: 10.22108/nea.2016.21056 (In Persian)
• [9] Pakzad M., Khosravi Babadi A., Poushaneh K., Assareh A., Reza Zade H.R. Phenomenology of evaluating learning outcomes. Journal of Theory and Practice in Curriculum. 2021; 9(17): 39-90. (In Persian)
• [10] Roshani Ali Bena See H., Fathi Vajargah K., Khorasani A. The Challenges of the Quality Evaluation of Virtual Education Curriculum: The Case of Shahid Beheshti University. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 2017; 7(18): 29-52. (In Persian)
• [11] Mohammadloo J., Mohammadi S. Virtual Evaluation. Majaleh Roshd. 2021; URL: https://b2n.ir/u76707 (In Persian)
• [12] karamalian H., Jafari harandi R., Ebadi H. A study of the qualitative descriptive evaluation problems from Primary School teacher's and manager's point of view. New Educational Approaches. 2013; 8(2): 73-92. (In Persian)
• [13] Abbasi Kasani H., Shams Mourkani G., Seraji F., Rezaeezadeh M. Learners Assessment tools in e-learning. Roshd -e- Fanavari. 2020; 16(61): 23-33. (In Persian)
• [14] Hosseinizadeh S. A. Educational evaluation in behavior (Sireh) of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and Ahle Beit (PBUH). Biquarterly Journal of Islamic Education. 2008; 3(5): 37. (In Persian)
• [15] Chen H., Su Y., Zheng Q., Li L. Towards an operationalized and effective school self-evaluation system: An ongoing action research study in Chinese secondary schools since 2011. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2019; 60: 117-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.005
• [16] Coates H. Assessing student learning outcomes internationally: Insights and frontiers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2016; 41(5): 662-676.
• [17] Klimova B. F. Evaluation methods as an effective tool for the development of students’ learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 152 (7): 112-115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.165
• [18] Fuller I., Rawlinson S., Bevan R. Evaluation of Student Learning Experiences in Physical Geography Fieldwork: Paddling or pedagogy?. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2000; 24(2): 199-215, DOI: 10.1080/713677388
• [19] Kameoka V. A., Lister L. Evaluation of Student Learning Outcomes in MSW Programs. Journal of Social Work Education. 1991; 27(3): 251-257.
• [20] Moustakas C. E. Phenomenology research methods. Thousand Oaks, Ca; Sage Publications, 1994.
• [21] Strauss A. L., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.
• [22] Abbaszadeh M. Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2012; 23(1): 19-34. (In Persian)
• [23] Seraji F. Evaluation in the virtual environment. Curriculum and information and communication technology. 2014; Internet link: http://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir (In Persian).